In a candid revelation that has captured the attention of the Indonesian public, prominent musician and entrepreneur Maia Estianty has stated that she no longer recalls any positive attributes or "good deeds" of her former husband, Ahmad Dhani. The statement, delivered during a period of resurfacing tensions between the two iconic figures of the Indonesian music industry, underscores a definitive psychological and emotional detachment that Estianty has cultivated over the nearly two decades since their high-profile separation. Speaking on a podcast hosted by media personality Ivan Gunawan, which aired on the C8 YouTube channel on Saturday, May 2, 2026, Estianty articulated a philosophy of radical forward momentum, suggesting that her inability to remember Dhani’s virtues is not a product of malice, but a byproduct of her commitment to "moving on."
The dialogue began when Gunawan questioned Estianty about the positive aspects of her past relationship with the Dewa 19 frontman. Estianty’s response was immediate and punctuated by laughter, though its implications were perceived as deeply resolute. She noted that she had "completely forgotten" those details, explaining that once she decides to move forward from a chapter in her life, the contents of that chapter—both the positive and the negative—are essentially archived beyond her active consciousness. This mental "sorting" process, according to Estianty, extends beyond her former marriage to include social circles and past friendships that no longer align with her current life path.
A History of Public Discord and Professional Rivalry
To understand the weight of Estianty’s recent comments, one must look back at the complex history of her relationship with Ahmad Dhani. The pair was once considered the "power couple" of the Indonesian music scene in the late 1990s and early 2000s. While Dhani led Dewa 19 to legendary status, Estianty founded the duo Ratu, which became a commercial juggernaut. Their divorce in 2008, however, remains one of the most documented and controversial events in Indonesian entertainment history.
The dissolution of their marriage was marred by allegations of infidelity and a protracted legal battle over the custody of their three sons: Ahmad Al Ghazali, El Jallaludin Rumi, and Abdul Qodir Jaelani. The subsequent marriage of Ahmad Dhani to Mulan Jameela, who was Estianty’s former partner in Ratu, created a narrative of betrayal that has persisted in the public imagination for over 18 years. Despite several attempts at public reconciliation for the sake of their children, the relationship between Estianty and Dhani has remained icy, characterized by occasional media barbs and a strict avoidance of one another at industry events.
The current flare-up in tension appears to have been triggered by recent statements made by Dhani regarding the circumstances of their past household. In the weeks leading up to Estianty’s podcast appearance, Dhani had reportedly revisited sensitive topics in various interviews, prompting a renewed wave of speculation and social media commentary. Estianty’s decision to declare a total loss of memory regarding his "good side" is seen by analysts as a strategic move to neutralize his provocations by demonstrating complete emotional indifference.
The Philosophy of "Moving Forward" as a Defense Mechanism
Estianty’s rhetoric during the interview centered on the concept of "sorting" one’s life. She described a disciplined approach to mental health where individuals who no longer contribute positively to her environment are "deleted" from her emotional ledger. "Because I am the type of person who, once I move forward, what is behind me is just ‘bye,’" she told Gunawan. This approach, she argues, is essential for maintaining her peace of mind in the face of persistent public scrutiny.
Psychological experts often refer to this as "emotional compartmentalization" or "selective forgetting," a coping mechanism used by individuals who have experienced significant trauma or prolonged public conflict. By choosing not to engage with the memory of Dhani’s positive traits, Estianty effectively removes the "hooks" that could lead to nostalgia or renewed hurt. Her statement that she does not interfere in Dhani’s personal affairs or his relationship with their children further reinforces this boundary. "His business with the children is his business, not mine," she stated, emphasizing a clear separation of parental roles from personal history.
The Impact on the Second Generation: Al, El, and Dul
While Estianty maintains a firm boundary, she acknowledged the collateral damage that this perennial conflict inflicts on their three sons. Al, El, and Dul, who are now established figures in the entertainment industry in their own right, often find themselves as the unwilling intermediaries between two polarizing parents. Estianty admitted that the boys are the ones who suffer most when the media cycle revives the drama of the past.
"The children are the ones who are sometimes dizzy in the middle," she remarked. "Actually, if anyone is confused or stressed, it isn’t me; it’s these three children." This admission highlights the difficulty of navigating a "blended" family dynamic when the foundational relationship remains fractured. Despite their parents’ differences, the three sons have frequently attempted to bridge the gap, often seen attending events for both parents and maintaining a neutral public stance. However, the recurring nature of the public disputes makes this neutrality increasingly difficult to maintain.
Chronology of Recent Events Leading to the Statement
The timeline of this latest controversy can be traced back to early 2026, when several factors converged to bring the Dhani-Maia saga back to the headlines:
- January 2026: Ahmad Dhani releases a series of retrospective videos on his social media platforms, discussing the creative process behind Dewa 19’s early hits, some of which were inspired by his early years with Estianty.
- February 2026: In a televised interview, Dhani makes a cryptic comment regarding "loyalty" and "the truth of the past," which many netizens interpreted as a slight toward Estianty.
- March 2026: Rumors of a potential professional reunion for a charity concert are swiftly debunked by Estianty’s management, citing "irreconcilable professional differences."
- April 2026: Public interest peaks as social media influencers begin "deep dives" into the history of Ratu and the 2008 divorce, leading to a surge in search traffic for both names.
- May 2, 2026: Estianty appears on the C8 Podcast, where she delivers the "I have forgotten" statement, effectively shutting down the narrative of nostalgia.
Market and Media Implications
The enduring public interest in the Estianty-Dhani dynamic is a testament to their status as cultural icons. From a media perspective, their conflict generates significant engagement. The YouTube clip featuring Estianty’s remarks garnered hundreds of thousands of views within hours of its release, illustrating the "click-driven" nature of Indonesian infotainment.
However, from a professional branding standpoint, Estianty’s approach has been highly successful. Since her marriage to businessman Irwan Mussry in 2018, she has rebranded herself as a "survivor" and a successful entrepreneur, moving away from the "scorned wife" narrative that the media initially imposed on her. Her recent comments serve to solidify this brand of independence. By contrast, Dhani’s occasional revisitation of the past is often viewed by younger demographics as an inability to move beyond his "golden era," though his loyal fan base continues to defend his right to discuss his history.
Broader Socio-Cultural Analysis
The reaction to Estianty’s statements also reflects a shift in Indonesian societal values regarding divorce and women’s autonomy. In previous decades, a divorced woman was often expected to remain silent or maintain a degree of "devotion" to the father of her children. Estianty’s blunt refusal to even remember her ex-husband’s good qualities is seen by many modern Indonesian women as an empowering stance—a refusal to be defined by a past relationship.
Conversely, some traditionalists view her comments as unnecessarily harsh, arguing that for the sake of the children, a facade of mutual respect (including acknowledging past goodness) should be maintained. This cultural divide is played out daily in the comments sections of news outlets and social media platforms, where "Team Maia" and "Team Dhani" continue to debate the ethics of their public conduct.
Conclusion: The Finality of the "Bye"
Maia Estianty’s declaration that she has "forgotten everything" about Ahmad Dhani’s virtues marks a significant milestone in their public history. It is a statement of finality that suggests that while they may forever be linked through their children and their musical legacies, the emotional connection has been entirely severed. For Estianty, the past is not a place to visit, and the "sorting" of her life is a permanent act.
As the Indonesian entertainment landscape continues to evolve, the saga of Maia and Dhani serves as a reminder of the complexities of life in the public eye. While the media may continue to probe for signs of reconciliation or lingering resentment, Estianty’s message is clear: she has moved forward, and the rearview mirror has been intentionally blurred. Whether this will finally bring an end to the public’s obsession with their past remains to be seen, but for Estianty, the chapter is not just closed—it is, for all intents and purposes, unreadable.








