Eko Sulistyo
The domestic conflict between South Korean influencer and chef Na Daehoon and his former wife, Julia Prastini, widely known as Jule, has reached a critical boiling point following a series of provocative social media posts. The tension escalated significantly on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, when Na Daehoon broke his long-standing silence regarding the couple’s private affairs. The catalyst for this public outburst was the appearance of his three children in social media uploads shared by Safrie Ramadhan, Jule’s current partner, which contained captions that Na Daehoon characterized as inappropriate, disrespectful, and emotionally damaging.
Since the finalization of their divorce in late 2025, Na Daehoon has generally maintained a reserved public persona regarding the dissolution of his marriage. However, the recent involvement of his children in what he perceives as "tasteless jokes" by Safrie Ramadhan prompted a sharp and defensive response. The controversy stems from two specific posts shared on Safrie’s secondary Instagram account, which features a more unfiltered look into his personal life. These posts, which have since circulated widely across Indonesian social media platforms, depicted Safrie interacting with Na Daehoon’s children and Jule in a manner that many observers have labeled as insensitive.
In the first contentious upload, Safrie is seen posing with one of Na Daehoon’s children. The image itself might have appeared benign if not for the accompanying caption: "It is clear who they are happier with, I swear, just kidding." While the phrase was followed by a disclaimer of it being a "joke," Na Daehoon and many of his followers interpreted the statement as a direct slight against his capabilities and relationship as a biological father. The implication that the children preferred their mother’s new partner over their father touched a nerve in a culture where paternal respect is deeply valued.
The second post proved even more inflammatory. It featured a photograph of Julia Prastini sleeping alongside her children. Safrie’s caption for this image read: "Finished putting the kids to sleep, now it’s time to put the mother to bed. This is the last joke of the year." The suggestive nature of the language, combined with the presence of the children in the same frame, sparked immediate backlash. Critics argued that such comments were not only inappropriate for a public platform but also demonstrated a lack of boundaries regarding the children’s domestic environment.
Na Daehoon’s Public Rebuttal and Ultimatum
Na Daehoon’s reaction was swift and laden with palpable frustration. Taking to his official Instagram Story, he reposted the content shared by Safrie to ensure his grievances were contextualized for his audience. In a series of emotional statements, he questioned the moral compass of both his former wife and her new partner.
"To be honest, I have held back until this point. I have NEVER disparaged your name, @juliaprt7," Na Daehoon wrote, addressing his former spouse directly. He continued by questioning the empathy of the pair, asking if they felt any remorse for the impact of their actions on his three young children. "Please answer me, if you and your boyfriend are still human, is there not even a small sense of guilt? For destroying a household with three small children in it?"
For Na Daehoon, the primary issue is the perceived weaponization of his children for social media engagement and "clout." He emphasized that while adults are free to navigate their romantic lives as they see fit, the children should remain a neutral and protected zone. He challenged the notion that such behavior could be dismissed as mere humor, stating, "Do you think destroying the lives of three children can be called a JOKE? At the very least, is there no respect for me as their father?"
The confrontation reached a peak when Na Daehoon issued a stern ultimatum. He suggested that his silence thus far had been a choice made to protect his children’s privacy and his own dignity, but warned that he would not hesitate to reveal more damaging information about the circumstances of their split if the provocations continued. "If this continues, I will open up about everything. This is for the sake of protecting myself and my children," he declared.
Background and Context of the Relationship
The dissolution of the marriage between Na Daehoon and Julia Prastini has been a subject of public interest in Indonesia for several years. Na Daehoon first gained prominence as a South Korean expatriate who embraced Indonesian culture, eventually becoming a successful chef and content creator. His marriage to Julia Prastini, an influencer in her own right, was often portrayed as a "fairytale" intercultural romance, garnering them a massive following of millions across TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube.
The couple, who share three children, appeared to have a stable domestic life until rumors of a rift began to surface in mid-2025. While the specific reasons for their divorce were never fully disclosed to the public, Na Daehoon’s recent comments regarding a "destroyed household" have reignited speculation regarding the timeline of Jule’s relationship with Safrie Ramadhan. The transition from a family unit to a co-parenting dynamic has clearly been fraught with underlying tension, which has now spilled over into the digital space.
The Role of Social Media in Modern Divorce
This incident highlights a growing trend in the "influencer era," where private family disputes are litigated in the court of public opinion. Experts in digital ethics and family psychology note that when public figures use their children as props in post-divorce narratives, the long-term psychological impact on the children can be profound. The "digital footprint" created by these posts—ranging from Safrie’s jokes to Na Daehoon’s angry rebuttals—will remain accessible to the children as they grow older.
Furthermore, the case of Na Daehoon and Julia Prastini serves as a case study in the complexities of "sharenting" (the practice of parents sharing extensive content about their children online). In Indonesia, where social media penetration is high and celebrity culture is pervasive, the boundaries between private parenting and public entertainment are often blurred. The use of suggestive or competitive captions involving minors raises significant concerns regarding child protection and the ethical responsibilities of guardians.
Legal and Social Implications in Indonesia
While Na Daehoon’s current response is confined to social media, the situation carries potential legal weight under Indonesian law. The Law on Child Protection (Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak) emphasizes the right of children to be protected from psychological abuse and environments that may harm their mental well-being. Legal analysts suggest that if the conflict continues to escalate, it could influence future custody arrangements or result in mediation by the Indonesian Child Protection Commission (KPAI).
Socially, the backlash against Safrie Ramadhan has been significant. Many netizens have rallied behind Na Daehoon, citing a "bro code" or general parental ethics that dictate a new partner should maintain a respectful distance from the biological father’s role, especially in the early stages of a post-divorce transition. Conversely, some defenders of Julia Prastini argue that the posts were taken out of context and that she has the right to move on with her life.
Analysis of the Escalation
The intensity of Na Daehoon’s anger suggests that the Instagram Stories were merely the "tip of the iceberg" in a much larger, private conflict. His mention of "holding back" and "not disparaging her name" implies that there are undisclosed grievances—possibly related to infidelity or financial disputes—that he has refrained from making public to maintain a semblance of peace for the children.
The shift from a "chef and family man" persona to a "protective father at his limit" marks a significant turning point for Na Daehoon’s public image. For Safrie Ramadhan, the "jokester" persona he attempted to project has largely backfired, as the public generally perceives jokes involving children and sexual innuendos about their mother as a breach of social decorum.
Broader Impact on the Influencer Community
As the story continues to develop, it serves as a cautionary tale for other influencers navigating public breakups. The immediate gratification of "winning" a social media interaction can lead to long-term damage to one’s reputation and, more importantly, the stability of the children involved. The Indonesian public, while often entertained by "drama," has shown a consistent trend of turning against figures who are perceived to be exploiting or neglecting the emotional needs of minors.
At this stage, neither Julia Prastini nor Safrie Ramadhan has issued a formal apology or a comprehensive response to Na Daehoon’s ultimatum. Whether the parties will move toward a private resolution or if Na Daehoon will follow through on his threat to "reveal everything" remains to be seen. For now, the three children at the center of this storm remain the primary concern for observers who hope for a return to a more stable and respectful co-parenting environment.
The situation remains fluid, with followers of all three parties closely monitoring their social media accounts for the next development. As of Wednesday evening, the controversial posts had been removed or archived, but the digital discourse surrounding them continues to expand across various platforms.
